Minggu, 29 Maret 2015
Forests, People, Rights and Resources in Baliem Valley
By Yunus Yumte at 18.19
No comments
This story was developed when we submitted the full reports to IUCN for the 1st Phase Pro Poor REDD project on 2013. Samdhana was the project Implementer in Indonesia. I found it's important to be published in order to share a knowledge and information widely about the valley we been working since 15 years ago.
The link between forest and traditional livelihoods is strong. The traditional house, the honai, made out of forest products, has
great symbolic, ritual and practical significance for local people. The men’s’
honai consists of a round, domed house where men sleep and store items of
ritual importance. The rectangular women’s’ honai
is divided into areas for women and children to sleep, a kitchen, and a pig
keeping area. Each family may have their own honai, but each suku also has a honai
specially for storing objects that belong to people who have died.
The people of the region practice rotational agriculture of
root crops, mainly taro and sweet potatoes. Pigs play an important role in
rituals. A wide range of forest products are collected for subsistence and cash
needs. Irrigated rice and permanent vegetable gardens have been developed in
the bottom of the valley close to the town of Wamena, in response to
opportunities for marketing. Coffee was introduced by Government and private
enterprise and has been adopted by some farmers.
In comparison to the low land of Papua, Baliem’s forests are lower and less
dense, being dominated by mountain forests with small trees. However the degradation
rate in Baliem valley is higher than some part in low land because timber is the main source
of cash for the community and of building material for the rapidly expanding
town of Wamena. Wood is used not only for energy – fuel wood – but also for
housing, garden fences and bridges. An multi-disciplinary Landscape assessment
conducted by Samdhana’s partners in the valley under an earlier project found
that timber was the main contributor to monthly household income, with 25 – 60
% of cash income of men and women in villages near Wamena derived from selling
forest timber products. As a result, Baliem is also important for the
maintenance of carbon stocks. Approaches to mitigation through improved forest
and land use management in the valley need to take account of this local use,
and ensure that community livelihoods are strengthened at the same time as
reducing the pressure on forests.
Land Rights and Resources
Baliem was ‘discovered’ by the outside world in 1938
when the densely populated valley was seen from an overflying plane, but it was
not until 1945 that the first outsiders, missionaries, arrived on foot in the
valley. At that time there were reported to be 95,000 people in the valley,
predominantly of Dani and Lani ethnic groups, who speak different dialects of
the same language. Traditionally, all land is the property of a clan and its
sub-divisions. In the past the boundaries between clans were dynamic, depending
on the relative strength and numbers of different clans, and the outcome of
warfare and alliances. Since the 1960s these local wars have been suppressed by
the government, although some disagreements over the location of boundaries remain.
Within each of the main ethnic-language groups,
population and territory is divided into customary territories which are
‘owned’ by a ‘clan’ (suku besar), which is further sub-divided into sub-clans
(suku) and thence into extended family units (marga), which are the principal unit of land and forest
resource ownership. Whilst a marga has
strong rights over its own land and resources, higher levels of leadership – a
war chief, an economy chief, and a farming and fertility chief – exist and have to give permission for some
activities. Zones are recognized within the landscape, each characterized by
typical plants, and allocated for a specific range of uses – farming, hunting,
gathering etc.
Land use and Forests Management
Overlain on the ‘customary’ map of the landscape is
the official land use map, which does not yet recognize customary rights in any
way. The fundamental official division of land use is between forest reserve
and non-forest reserve, which is available to the district for development,
agriculture and urban growth. Jayawijaya District is 44 % (104,677 Ha)
non-forest reserve, and 55% (129,233 Ha) forest reserve.
Within the forest reserve, as in all forest reserves
in Indonesia, the land is categorized by management objective as conservation,
protection or production forest. The total forest reserve area of Jayawijaya
(129,233 Ha) is 60% national park (76,895 Ha), 27% conversion forest (35,438
Ha) and 13% watershed protection forest (16,900 Ha). The allocation of forest
land use is determined by the central Forestry Department using a technical
formula based on slope, soils and other factors, but without any consideration
of social factors. As a result, settlements and farms are often included within
forest reserves. There are at least 40 settlements within forest reserves in
Jayawijaya.
Policy and Regulation
The Special Autonomy Regulation (Perdasus) 21 of 2008
About Recognition of Customary Rights, and Perdasus 23 of 2008 about Sustainable
Forest management in Papua legally have provide a big legal space for customary
community in Papua to taking part in forest and land use management on their
own customary territories. The regulation recognizes the communal rights of
indigenous communities and their right
to manage the forest resources found on their land, and to be involved in
decisions and to be compensated when the forests are used by others. However it
also notes that forest must be managed 'according to its designated function',
which implies restrictions in accordance with the standard forest categories
noted above. The regulation provides for the mapping and recognition of clam
territories and forest areas.
At landscape level there are no local regulations or
policies which regulate recognition and protection of customary land rights.
The national forestry law (law 41/1999) defines all forest land as state forest
unless there are legitimate prior rights over it – and communal and informal
rights are not recognized as such. Recent amendments to the law (e.g.
Government regulation 6/2007) have created new categories of license for
community and village groups, but the requirements remain complex, and no
assistance is available to support communities in implementing management. This
law has influence the implementation of Perdasus 21 – in which the community in
Papua should follow the legal steps required to get a forestry management license,
and in general the law still emphasize that the state is the forest owner.
Carbon and REDD
Will REDD+ still Have a Chance to be Implemented After Indonesian REDD+ Agency be Banned?
By Yunus Yumte at 07.10
No comments
From Annual Narrative Report to IUCN HQ - 2014
According to an article on 30 January 2015 in
REDD-monitor.org, „Indonesia’s president Joko Widodo has closed down the
country’s REDD+ Agency. The REDD+ Agency will now become part of the Ministry
of Environment and Forestry. Presidential Decree No. 16 of 2015 which came into
effect on 23 January 2015, revokes and declares invalid Presidential Decree No.
62, 2013, which created the REDD+ Agency as the world’s first Cabinet level REDD
institution. Indonesia’s National Council on Climate Change will also be closed
down and absorbed by the Ministry for Environment and Forestry. Both the REDD+
Agency and the NCCC will become part of a Directorate General of Climate Change.“
The absorption of the REDD+ agency into the
Ministry of Environment and Forestry may have positive and negative
implications for ongoing REDD+ development in Indonesia. An optimistic
perspective suggests that handling all forest and environmental issues including
REDD+ under one roof will make coordination and implementation more effective. But
if the Ministry of Environment and Forestry (MoEF) does not accommodate the REDD+
Agency’s previous progress, activities and momentum at the national and
sub-national levels may stop and eventually have to rebuilt from the beginning
stages. Some environmental and social NGOs in Indonesia are raising questions
about Indonesia’s commitment to reducing emissions from forestry and land uses
development in the future.
Since it was established in 2013, the REDD+
Agency has implemented two projects:, ‘cadastral maps development‘ and ‘the
community rights protection and recognition‘. These projects were implemented
in five provinces, including Papua and West Papua Provinces. These two projects
in particular help to build early safeguards through a spatial information
system and social tenurial rights for communities in the province/district. The
Samdhana Institute, the IUCN Implementing partner for the Toward Pro-poor
REDD+ Phase II project, won the bid for community rights protection and
recognition. This has built a strong momentum for Samdhana and partners to
bridge the Papuan customary rights issues into national forests and land uses
development, particularly through the implementation of Constitutional Court
decision MK35/2012 (‘MK 35’), which recognizes the rights of customary communities
in the state forests. Now that the REDD+ agency has been absorbed into MOEF,
the challenge is greater.
On the upside, MOEF raised three points that
it sees as evidence to continue the commitment of the REDD+ agency [1]:
- FMU (forests management units) as an answer to REDD+ implementation sites. The ministry pointed out that about 600 units will be created and facilitated to manage about 137 million ha of forests. The FMUs are intended to increase good forest governance, create appropriate platforms for benefit sharing and solve the tenurial rights problems.
- The Minister is also targeting to allocate 12 million ha to be managed by communities and indigenous people. Village forests, community forests and community plantation forests are the 3 policies they will push in the next 5 years.
- According to an opinion piece in the Jakarta Post written by Pungky Widiaryanto on 31 Jan 2015: “The Minister just established a de-bottlenecking policy by delegating all forestry related businesses’ permits to the Investment Coordinating Board (BKPM). In addition to one-stop licensing services, this new policy principally aims to prevent corrupt practices. Furthermore, the Minister also promises to continue the one map policy initiative for avoiding overlap land allocation in administering the forest areas.“