My Ideas and Stories About PAPUA

Making the rich and beautiful resources in Papua become the social economic strength for Papuan has become the long home works. Many people believe that the early start to find the answer is by understanding how Papua looks like, their communities and their special strength. And it can be realize by directly in touch with them. This blogs provides you chance to touch and gets insight ideas, trends and stories about Papua.
  • Stories About Beautiful Papua

    Every Single Place In Papua Have Its Stories To Be Shared To Build Other People Understanding About This Island

  • The Last Frotier Primary Forests

    With 42 Million ha of forests, Papua play crucial rules in Indonensia forests development targets.

  • Women and Natural Resources

    Forests or land right are not only about Man. So understanding the roles women and the impact of forests changes to women are also crucial

  • Our Traditional Value

    Papuan Community Have Been Living for Centuries with Their Knowledge and Wisdom in Managing Natural Resources and Practice Best Conservation

  • For Papuan Generation

    Every Works We Do Now Must Be Dedicated To The Future Papuan Generation

  • Dependency to Forests Resources

    Practicing Good Forests Governance in Papus About Understing the Right of Indigenous People and Their Dependency to Natural Resources

  • All Are Wonderful

    You Will Get Good Scene That You May Not Able Somewhere Else - Only In PAPUA

  • Bitter Nut Is Papuan Favorit Gums

    Bitter Nut or In Papua We Call 'Pinang' Is The Local Gum You Can See In Every Corner of the Cities. Papuan People Love To Chewing It. Sometime People Consider It As Contact Material When You Travel to The Village

  • Papuan Traditional Conservation Practices

    For Centuries, Papuan Has Practicing Local Wisdom to Sustainaible Use of Natural Resources. They Have Traditional Education System to Teaching Them How To Interact With Human, Spiritual Power and Understanding The Words Of Nature

Minggu, 29 Maret 2015

Forests, People, Rights and Resources in Baliem Valley

This story was developed when we submitted the full reports to IUCN for the 1st Phase Pro Poor REDD project on 2013. Samdhana was the project Implementer in Indonesia. I found it's important to be published in order to share a knowledge and information widely about the valley we been working since 15 years ago.


Land Rights and Resources

Baliem was ‘discovered’ by the outside world in 1938 when the densely populated valley was seen from an overflying plane, but it was not until 1945 that the first outsiders, missionaries, arrived on foot in the valley. At that time there were reported to be 95,000 people in the valley, predominantly of Dani and Lani ethnic groups, who speak different dialects of the same language. Traditionally, all land is the property of a clan and its sub-divisions. In the past the boundaries between clans were dynamic, depending on the relative strength and numbers of different clans, and the outcome of warfare and alliances. Since the 1960s these local wars have been suppressed by the government, although some disagreements over the location of boundaries remain.

Within each of the main ethnic-language groups, population and territory is divided into customary territories which are ‘owned’ by a ‘clan’ (suku besar), which is further sub-divided into sub-clans (suku) and thence into extended family units (marga), which are the principal unit of land and forest resource  ownership. Whilst a marga has strong rights over its own land and resources, higher levels of leadership – a war chief, an economy chief, and a farming and fertility chief  – exist and have to give permission for some activities. Zones are recognized within the landscape, each characterized by typical plants, and allocated for a specific range of uses – farming, hunting, gathering etc.

The link between forest and traditional livelihoods is strong.  The traditional house, the honai, made out of forest products, has great symbolic, ritual and practical significance for local people. The men’s’ honai consists of a round, domed house where men sleep and store items of ritual importance. The rectangular women’s’ honai is divided into areas for women and children to sleep, a kitchen, and a pig keeping area. Each family may have their own honai, but each suku also has a honai specially for storing objects that belong to people who have died.


Land use and Forests Management

Overlain on the ‘customary’ map of the landscape is the official land use map, which does not yet recognize customary rights in any way. The fundamental official division of land use is between forest reserve and non-forest reserve, which is available to the district for development, agriculture and urban growth. Jayawijaya District is 44 % (104,677 Ha) non-forest reserve, and 55% (129,233 Ha) forest reserve.

Within the forest reserve, as in all forest reserves in Indonesia, the land is categorized by management objective as conservation, protection or production forest. The total forest reserve area of Jayawijaya (129,233 Ha) is 60% national park (76,895 Ha), 27% conversion forest (35,438 Ha) and 13% watershed protection forest (16,900 Ha). The allocation of forest land use is determined by the central Forestry Department using a technical formula based on slope, soils and other factors, but without any consideration of social factors. As a result, settlements and farms are often included within forest reserves. There are at least 40 settlements within forest reserves in Jayawijaya.

The people of the region practice rotational agriculture of root crops, mainly taro and sweet potatoes. Pigs play an important role in rituals. A wide range of forest products are collected for subsistence and cash needs. Irrigated rice and permanent vegetable gardens have been developed in the bottom of the valley close to the town of Wamena, in response to opportunities for marketing. Coffee was introduced by Government and private enterprise and has been adopted by some farmers.


Policy and Regulation

The Special Autonomy Regulation (Perdasus) 21 of 2008 About Recognition of Customary Rights, and Perdasus 23 of 2008 about Sustainable Forest management in Papua legally have provide a big legal space for customary community in Papua to taking part in forest and land use management on their own customary territories. The regulation recognizes the communal rights of indigenous communities and  their right to manage the forest resources found on their land, and to be involved in decisions and to be compensated when the forests are used by others. However it also notes that forest must be managed 'according to its designated function', which implies restrictions in accordance with the standard forest categories noted above. The regulation provides for the mapping and recognition of clam territories and forest areas. 

At landscape level there are no local regulations or policies which regulate recognition and protection of customary land rights. The national forestry law (law 41/1999) defines all forest land as state forest unless there are legitimate prior rights over it – and communal and informal rights are not recognized as such. Recent amendments to the law (e.g. Government regulation 6/2007) have created new categories of license for community and village groups, but the requirements remain complex, and no assistance is available to support communities in implementing management. This law has influence the implementation of Perdasus 21 – in which the community in Papua should follow the legal steps required to get a forestry management license, and in general the law still emphasize that the state is the forest owner.


Carbon and REDD

In comparison to the low land of Papua, Baliem’s forests are lower and less dense, being dominated by mountain forests with small trees. However the degradation rate in Baliem valley is higher than some part in low land because timber is the main source of cash for the community and of building material for the rapidly expanding town of Wamena. Wood is used not only for energy – fuel wood – but also for housing, garden fences and bridges. An multi-disciplinary Landscape assessment conducted by Samdhana’s partners in the valley under an earlier project found that timber was the main contributor to monthly household income, with 25 – 60 % of cash income of men and women in villages near Wamena derived from selling forest timber products. As a result, Baliem is also important for the maintenance of carbon stocks. Approaches to mitigation through improved forest and land use management in the valley need to take account of this local use, and ensure that community livelihoods are strengthened at the same time as reducing the pressure on forests.

Will REDD+ still Have a Chance to be Implemented After Indonesian REDD+ Agency be Banned?

From Annual Narrative Report to IUCN HQ - 2014

According to an article on 30 January 2015 in REDD-monitor.org, „Indonesia’s president Joko Widodo has closed down the country’s REDD+ Agency. The REDD+ Agency will now become part of the Ministry of Environment and Forestry. Presidential Decree No. 16 of 2015 which came into effect on 23 January 2015, revokes and declares invalid Presidential Decree No. 62, 2013, which created the REDD+ Agency as the world’s first Cabinet level REDD institution. Indonesia’s National Council on Climate Change will also be closed down and absorbed by the Ministry for Environment and Forestry. Both the REDD+ Agency and the NCCC will become part of a Directorate General of Climate Change.“

The absorption of the REDD+ agency into the Ministry of Environment and Forestry may have positive and negative implications for ongoing REDD+ development in Indonesia. An optimistic perspective suggests that handling all forest and environmental issues including REDD+ under one roof will make coordination and implementation more effective. But if the Ministry of Environment and Forestry (MoEF) does not accommodate the REDD+ Agency’s previous progress, activities and momentum at the national and sub-national levels may stop and eventually have to rebuilt from the beginning stages. Some environmental and social NGOs in Indonesia are raising questions about Indonesia’s commitment to reducing emissions from forestry and land uses development in the future.

Since it was established in 2013, the REDD+ Agency has implemented two projects:, ‘cadastral maps development‘ and ‘the community rights protection and recognition‘. These projects were implemented in five provinces, including Papua and West Papua Provinces. These two projects in particular help to build early safeguards through a spatial information system and social tenurial rights for communities in the province/district. The Samdhana Institute, the IUCN Implementing partner for the Toward Pro-poor REDD+ Phase II project, won the bid for community rights protection and recognition. This has built a strong momentum for Samdhana and partners to bridge the Papuan customary rights issues into national forests and land uses development, particularly through the implementation of Constitutional Court decision MK35/2012 (‘MK 35’), which recognizes the rights of customary communities in the state forests. Now that the REDD+ agency has been absorbed into MOEF, the challenge is greater.

Currently the district and province stakeholders preparing for REDD+ implementation are uncertain about how to move forward with the current strategies and action plans. Some agreements initiated between province, district, and national REDD+ stakeholders have also stopped for the time being until the new climate change director at MOEF gives a clear direction.

On the upside, MOEF raised three points that it sees as evidence to continue the commitment of the REDD+ agency [1]:

  • FMU (forests management units) as an answer to REDD+ implementation sites. The ministry pointed out that about 600 units will be created and facilitated to manage about 137 million ha of forests. The FMUs are intended to increase good forest governance, create appropriate platforms for benefit sharing and solve the tenurial rights problems.
  • The Minister is also targeting to allocate 12 million ha to be managed by communities and indigenous people. Village forests, community forests and community plantation forests are the 3 policies they will push in the next 5 years.
  • According to an opinion piece in the Jakarta Post written by Pungky Widiaryanto on 31 Jan 2015: “The Minister just established a de-bottlenecking policy by delegating all forestry related businesses’ permits to the Investment Coordinating Board (BKPM). In addition to one-stop licensing services, this new policy principally aims to prevent corrupt practices. Furthermore, the Minister also promises to continue the one map policy initiative for avoiding overlap land allocation in administering the forest areas.“